<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>taylorkarras.com &#187; tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taylorkarras.com/tag/tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taylorkarras.com</link>
	<description>The official site of Taylor Karras.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:43:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>This new &#8220;Estimated funds availability&#8221; thing on eBay is pissing me off!</title>
		<link>http://www.taylorkarras.com/2011/10/11/this-new-estimated-funds-availability-thing-on-ebay-is-pissing-me-off/</link>
		<comments>http://www.taylorkarras.com/2011/10/11/this-new-estimated-funds-availability-thing-on-ebay-is-pissing-me-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Karras</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alienation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asterisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avaliabilty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullshit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estimated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fradulent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frustrating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fulfillment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innocent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lazy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legitimate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misclassification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PayPal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red tape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scrict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sudden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unusual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veterans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weeks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[withholding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylorkarras.com/?p=539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, I&#8217;ve been an eBay seller since 2010 and I&#8217;ve managed to sell a few items, most of them on-time and most of them with a tracking number. Most of these did not result in feedback given back to me but that doesn&#8217;t matter much, what does matter is the funds; which I have always [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I&#8217;ve been an eBay seller since 2010 and I&#8217;ve managed to sell a few items, most of them on-time and most of them with a tracking number. Most of these did not result in feedback given back to me but that doesn&#8217;t matter much, what does matter is the <em>funds</em>; which I have always received instantly and manage to put into my bank account after the whole shipping process is done and over with. But recently I found something on the very bottom of the item I sold; something in <strong>bold</strong>, something with asterisk near it; and it particularly bothered me to the point where I slammed my keyboard in frustration. What you&#8217;re are about to see below will probably get you frustrated as well&#8230;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.taylorkarras.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/estimatedfundsaviliability.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-540 alignnone" title="Yeah, feel free to pound your keyboards now." src="http://www.taylorkarras.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/estimatedfundsaviliability.jpg" alt="" width="481" height="123" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Yeah&#8230; &#8220;<em>Estimated funds availability<sup>*</sup></em>&#8220;, It seems like eBay has finally gotten so many complaints about fraudulent buyers/board members complaining about how eBay Buyer Protection is costing them money by the second that they decided to implement this in an attempt to provoke &#8220;successful fulfillment&#8221;&#8230; What? How does eBay think this will provoke &#8220;<em>successful fulfillment?</em>&#8221; All this does is make people want to leave eBay for other places, I mean seriously; whatever happened to trust? You mean to tell me that the times that I <em>fulfilled</em> the obligations successfully didn&#8217;t count? I&#8217;ve been doing this since 2010, I&#8217;ve shipped mostly on the day the buyer paid up front, I&#8217;ve been known to be honest in my descriptions, I&#8217;ve been known to communicate with my buyers whenever there&#8217;s a problem. So what is it with eBay treating me like I&#8217;m a first time seller and giving me restrictions that I worked hard to lift? Did they implement this months earlier, did they implement this today and I didn&#8217;t get a message about it? Well, disregarding the date it was implemented, it&#8217;s obvious that it&#8217;s a <em>bad</em> idea.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I mean let&#8217;s go to what they require for them to lift the &#8220;<em>Estimated funds avaliability<sup>*</sup></em>&#8220;.</p>
<ul>
<li style="text-align: center;">It&#8217;s been more than 90 days since your first successful sale;</li>
<li style="text-align: center;">You&#8217;ve had more than 25 sales transactions; and</li>
<li style="text-align: center;">You&#8217;ve had more than $250 in total sales.</li>
</ul>
<p>Okay, it&#8217;s been 90 days since my first successful sale; maybe I&#8217;ve had about $250 in total sales but I don&#8217;t know if I had more then 25 sales transactions; point is, how is anybody who casually uses eBay able to live with this <em>bullshit</em>? I mean not everybody is here to set up a store, not everybody is a hardcore eBay user and not everybody is willing to wait 2-3 weeks for your money; some people need the money now and those people may be honest people who are willing to fulfill their obligations. I mean in <em>two to three weeks</em>, what happens if they don&#8217;t get their money by then&#8230; I admit, there are some people who are willing to scam people for a quick but but I feel like this situation can be fixed by eBay actually <em>enforcing</em> their rules instead of just implementing this weak ass quick fix; I mean billions of people wouldn&#8217;t be scammed if eBay just got off their <em>lazy</em> ass and enforce eBay. I mean why should we casual eBay users have to suffer just because eBay is incapable of enforcing their site? We&#8217;re not <em>scammers</em>, we&#8217;re honest decent people, why should we be put in the same group and be subject to very strict regulations that require us to meet these requirements in order to lift the restrictions? Answer me that eBay. Speaking of which, let&#8217;s see what&#8217;s under the asterisk&#8230;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.taylorkarras.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/becauseofebayorpaypalpolicies.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-542 aligncenter" title="" src="http://www.taylorkarras.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/becauseofebayorpaypalpolicies.jpg" alt="" width="608" height="62" /></a></p>
<p>Yes, you read it right. &#8220;<em><sup>*</sup>The estimated funds availability date may change <span style="text-decoration: underline;">because of eBay or PayPal policies.</span></em>&#8221; As if things couldn&#8217;t get any worse; I mean I have to worry about whether or not eBay or PayPal policies could affect the delivery funds; and as everybody knows, dealing with eBay and PayPal can be particularly <em>picky</em> due to the strict amount of policies and <em>horrible</em> communication that they have; I mean I once opened a PayPal case with a seller of an item who&#8217;s item didn&#8217;t exactly arrive; it took me alot of weeks of phone calls to PayPal in order for me to get my money back and the case resolved. Adding to that is the reasons which eBay specifies why your payment can be delayed; with reasons such as &#8220;<em>not meeting the minimum performance standard required of all eBay sellers</em>.&#8221; and &#8220;<em>a higher then normal level of risk associated with this transaction or with your account.</em>&#8221; What? You mean to tell me that I need to meet a <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>minimum performance standard?</em></span> But I already fulfilled the obligations, shipped the packages within one day and have reasonable community; you mean to tell me that all of that <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>doesn&#8217;t count?!?!</em></span><em> </em>It seems like that if you want it to count then buyers have to leave feedback to you and since barely anybody does that (maybe &#8220;<em>don&#8217;t forget to leave feedback.</em>&#8221; should be fucking blinking?) I have a lower then expected performance standard then I would have if people left feedback&#8230; Maybe they should take into factors <em>other</em> then feedback?</p>
<p>And what is it with <em>high-risk&#8230;</em> I mean &#8220;<em>a sudden spike of eBay Buyer Protection cases/PayPal disputes or claims</em>&#8221; can mean anything, especially since a user account can fraudulently create cases and therefore <em>fraudulently</em> create risk. Not everybody is honest you know, and there are ways of <em>gaming</em> the eBay system, this is just a malicious way of doing it that doesn&#8217;t seem to benefit the users who legitimately file eBay Buyer Protection cases/PayPal disputes or claims and the people who work hard to ensure that everybody who uses eBay is happy; and even if it&#8217;s proven as fraudulent, it&#8217;s not going to get resolved instantly; no, it&#8217;s going to take a <em>few days</em> because eBay/PayPal will have some <em>policies</em> that they have to fulfill before they give you back your full rights you had before the case. Also&#8230; &#8220;<em>unusual selling activity, items with an exceptionally high selling price, or sales in a new category or a category such as tickets, travel, or gift certificates</em>&#8221; I can understand the new category thing (still think that eBay should at least do the <em>trust</em> thing.) but what <em>constitutes</em> as <em>unusual selling activity or items with an exceptionally high selling price.</em> I mean for all I know I could be selling the item at the appropriate price and I could be selling the way I usually sell, how can PayPal <em>know</em> what constitutes as <em>unusual or exceptionally high?</em></p>
<p>You know the argument that&#8217;s been going on about what constitutes as copyright violations or fair use, same arguments apply here. The line between that isn&#8217;t exactly as clear as crystal just as much as the line between whether or not what they consider as unusual selling is considered usual to us, therefore PayPal/eBay can decide to lengthen the time before we get our funds due to what they perceive to be <em>unusual selling or high-risk</em> (that is to us <em>usual or normal-risk</em>) and there&#8217;d be little to nothing we can do about it because they&#8217;re the ones who control everything and well, with the way they handle disputes; it&#8217;ll likely take you many moons before you can ever get your point across and even if we manage to prove our points to eBay/PayPal; they&#8217;ll still restrict our funds because we still fit their <em>definition</em> of <em>unusual selling/high-risk selling</em>; I mean whatever happened to proof changing what we can do, whatever happened to our rights and our right to free speech (okay, I&#8217;m speaking in terms of fair use but it still applies here.) Speaking of which&#8230;</p>
<p>My estimated date the funds would be available would be four weeks; <em><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">four</span></strong></em>. That&#8217;s pretty long for someone who has been on eBay for about a <em>long time.</em> I mean sure, I noticed that there were steps I could do to get quicker access to my funds like shipping the item. So I did and guess how much time it now takes me&#8230; Yup<em>, three weeks</em>&#8230; I just got a week cut off from the estimate. You know, I shipped it on time; I shipped it as quickly as I could and yet they all they can manage to do is take a week off my estimated funds availability. It&#8217;s just like this <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV5-LcEmXls">Discover commercial</a>, except <em>replace card replacement</em> with <em>expected fund availability</em>. I mean seriously, I ship on time and I manage to get a week off. <em>I shouldn&#8217;t even get a fucking four weeks because I&#8217;ve been selling for a long time</em>, I mean do I, a longtime user have to meet their <em>strict</em> requirements in order for me to get my funds instantly? Even though they&#8217;re strict and they&#8217;re going to turn me away from eBay? Do I even have a choice in the matter? <em>No&#8230;</em> <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>what do you mean no???</em></span></p>
<p>At least they&#8217;re doing a good thing by reminding us that the funds would be delayed, even though they didn&#8217;t remind me at the time I created that auction&#8230; Seriously <em>check it out&#8230;</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.taylorkarras.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Fundswillnotbeavaliable.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-557" title="Fundswillnotbeavaliable" src="http://www.taylorkarras.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Fundswillnotbeavaliable.jpg" alt="" width="795" height="29" /></a></p>
<p>I mean<em> now</em> you remind me? <em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Now you remind me that my funds will be unavailable?!?!</span></em> All being pissed off aside, it would of been nice if they at least <em>told</em> us via an email or an eBay messages; I mean this is a <em>major change</em>, again I understand if you want to stop scammers in their tracks but this is something that affects <span style="text-decoration: underline;">all of us</span>; seriously, even a quick Google search shows that <a href="http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/paypal-withholding-funds-to-ebay-sellers-for-up-to-21-days/">there are people from 2010 who are pissed off by this change</a>; those people are honest eBay users just like me, they just want to sell stuff, they don&#8217;t want to wait <em>4-3 weeks</em> for their funds to arrive due to this &#8220;<em>estimated funds availability<sup>*</sup></em>&#8221; thing and what eBay/PayPal perceives as the <em>reasons</em> to implement it. I mean again, haven&#8217;t these people heard of trust, <em>or is that for people who meet eBay&#8217;s requirements.</em></p>
<p>All I know is that eBay has to <em>reconsider</em> this feature or else their losing a member to the thousands who walked away from the site due to this <em>bullshit.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taylorkarras.com/2011/10/11/this-new-estimated-funds-availability-thing-on-ebay-is-pissing-me-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Society is dying, we can&#8217;t help it</title>
		<link>http://www.taylorkarras.com/2011/05/23/society-is-dying-we-cant-help-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.taylorkarras.com/2011/05/23/society-is-dying-we-cant-help-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 06:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Karras</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4chan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awesome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheezeburger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dumbed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lolcats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[major]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbcuniversal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nerd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obsolete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prowess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[record]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revision3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shallow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superstar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thefinebros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tmz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylorkarras.com/?p=275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Borders, many people knew it as a book company but many people today know it as a company that is going under. That is evident by the fact that a long time ago, the store here in Mira Loma closed down. Bare empty areas, furniture everywhere, shells filled with nothing is what I saw when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Borders, many people knew it as a book company but many people today know it as a company that is going under. That is evident by the fact that a long time ago, the store here in Mira Loma closed down. Bare empty areas, furniture everywhere, shells filled with nothing is what I saw when I stepped in the place a while ago to pick up a book. It was like seeing the inside of a derelict mansion in the year 2025, a year where I&#8217;m guessing everything has gone to shit. That&#8217;s not the worst part, that book store was the only book store (<em>Target doesn&#8217;t count.</em>) in a shopping center filled to the brim with clothing stores and other crap. I don&#8217;t know what people&#8217;s obsession is with fashion and making a statement; I mean I don&#8217;t care about the latest trends or fitting in, I&#8217;ve tried to fit in and it&#8217;s basically impossible to do for me. Seriously, I can&#8217;t fit in with with the other people who in my opinion seem to care more about how they look rather then what&#8217;s going on into the world today, I mean shouldn&#8217;t your personality matter more then the stuff you wear? That doesn&#8217;t mean that there are a number of people that are but these are the worst contributers to society, and the ones that made society/culture the way it is.</p>
<p>I mean I get that society is constantly changing but in this day in age; we&#8217;ve got the internet, we&#8217;ve got 14 year old kids on the internet posting stupid crap that people seem to eat up and then we&#8217;ve got people who just try so hard to matter, try so hard to be cool and just fail at it. And these people are the ones forming the internet culture, also known as the realm of weird, stupid, and blatant. I mean we&#8217;ve got pictures of &#8220;lolcats&#8221;, shitty rage comics that I always somehow see on reddit (<em>owned by Conde Nast Digital.</em>) caption pictures, &#8220;verticals&#8221;, and signs of win, fail and epic. I mean seriously, there is alot of crap out there like this produced by people who try way to hard and they just eat it up. Hey, I&#8217;m not the kind of person to include &#8220;<em>LOL</em>&#8221; or &#8220;<em>oh hai&#8221;</em> into my posts, nor am I the one to monetize crap that 4chan has created <em>(or say that everything is &#8220;awesome&#8221; and &#8220;epic&#8221;, man do I hate those terms and the way people are using it; it just makes everything look whorish.),</em> nor do I fall to those memes that the media perpretraited.</p>
<p>Like with Rebecca Black, maker of the hit viral song &#8220;Friday&#8221; (which other people have produced and written) and the latest popular thing on the internet, which is thanks to Michael J. Nelson and that Tosh.0 guy on Comedy Central&#8230; Who I assume posted this because they thought she creating &#8220;the worst song in history&#8221; or so we thought. Yes they&#8217;re criticizing the video, the lyrics, basically anything due to the fact that well&#8230; Her video is both good and horrible at the same time (if that was just possible.) and I don&#8217;t see what the big deal is about her (and thousands of internet memes out there, not to say a few make sense.) If these two guys hadn&#8217;t posted it in their blog then we would of never heard of her and her video would just lay dormently with only a couple hundred or thousands of views. Which brings me to my point, most of these internet memes are only famous because the most famous blogs bring it to the uneducated masses, I can assure you that if something ended up on <em>TMZ</em> or one of the blogs on that vile &#8220;<em>Cheezeburger Network</em>&#8221; which just happens to be the producer of all the &#8220;memes&#8221; you see on the internet; then you&#8217;ll be hearing about it within seconds.</p>
<p>Both of the sites I listed are only part of a ring that contribute the worst in culture, that ring also includes most of <em>AOL</em> and <em>Grawker </em>and the entirety of<em> NBC Universal (there may be more but I can&#8217;t think of any at the moment); </em>sure, I may watch some of their TV channels and look at some of their sites but I&#8217;m focusing on the stuff that contributes to culture, so that doesn&#8217;t matter much to me. Most of these companies use their sources of media to influence the very fabric of culture, those in the ring are the worst offenders. I mean really; <strong>whoever thought of allowing Comcast to own NBC Universal is out of their freaking minds</strong>, I mean they already own some of the worst channels which put out trash that people manage to like, and they have the mindset of a 1930&#8242;s millionare who&#8217;s mean and snobby all because he has money <em>(this shows in their piss poor customer service and almost monopolistic like behavior.) </em>Buying NBC Universal and then removing the space from it just makes them the worst offender; they now have a massive media and news empire <em>(and a couple of theme parks)</em> they can use to influence everybody and anybody, and I just don&#8217;t trust Comcast with influencing society/the news, I mean you see what they did to geek/entertainment/style culture didn&#8217;t you? <em>(There are FCC roadblocks but I think they&#8217;re very inefficient, rediciolously even. It&#8217;s only a matter of time before Comcast finds a way to use NBC Universal to it&#8217;s advantage while getting around the roadblocks.)</em></p>
<p>There is also News Corp which is also a horrible offender but much has been said about them on the internet so I&#8217;ll let it be.</p>
<p>Anyways, these corporations choose which stuff is hot and which stuff ultimately gets left in the dust bin. They can choose what goes on the front page, who becomes famous, who gets to make a million dollars (because the world revolves money, which is the main problem which can never be fixed.) The fact that we rely so much on these sources is a part of society&#8217;s downfall because we have to rely on notable websites in order to find out what&#8217;s hot, like a baby with his pacifier. And the content creators suffer because they have to worry about creating something that&#8217;ll get a lot of views, that&#8217;ll take advantage of current events and that&#8217;ll get a lot of money. Most of which is appearing on <em>YouTube </em>(with shit like <em>TheFineBros.</em> that guy who rants with stupid transitions and stuff, and those doing stupid stuff that&#8217;ll get a lot of views.). I appreciate those who take the time to put up a quality product (like that Left 4 Dead painting I saw where the children are fighting child zombies) but mainly most of YouTube and the internet contains of crap that stupid people and people trying to look cool will obviously like, which is the problem when you let the mainstream dictate what you like, I don&#8217;t let the world tell me what to like and I certainly don&#8217;t let the stuff influence the stuff I say or create.</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t want to worry about creating stuff that the people should like; which brings me to why I don&#8217;t listen to mainstream radio anymore; the reason being that most of the stations are controlled by companies that have strict standards (companies such as <em>Clear Channel</em> and <em>Cumulus</em>.) You want to know the reason why radio is dead, it&#8217;s because they&#8217;re playing that stupid electro-pop stuff that is easily producible, sounds mostly the same and is easily disposable. Compared to those indie bands, I&#8217;m thinking they&#8217;ve thrown musical integrity out of the window in an attempt to make a popular song that will get stuck in peoples heads and onto their playlists as their favorite songs (easily the most shallowest songs ever.); and due to the power of payola (thanks to the major music companies <em>UMG</em>, <em>EMI</em>, <em>Sony</em> and <em>WMG</em>, who are also at fault because they&#8217;re the ones who can ensure that your shit gets radio play, and all for the signing away of a few rights and a guarantee that your albums will move units,  least you want to be kicked out into the cold.), they can ensure that that song will be played over and over and over again. (see the problem with money? Once you get a lot of it, it changes you, makes you really immoral.) <em>Clear Channel </em>stands out in the fact that you can upload your music to them and they&#8217;ll possibly play it on the radio station (or an New Music channel that can only be received by buying a useless HD Radio receiver.) if it&#8217;s good (read: shitty.) enough. The fact that I have to sit there and wonder (will Clear Channel play it? does it have a political message? does it speak out against democrats or republicans? does it have offensive subject matter?) about those questions just pisses me the fuck off, I have artistic integrity and I am not about to compromise that for a radio company that controls <strong>the rocker and black demographics, strip the soul out of an oldies station and lean heavily towards republican with their affiliation with Fox News.</strong> (Yes, I know it&#8217;s <em>News Corp.</em> but I watch some of their stuff; I will never watch <em>Fox News </em>or any of those news channels though.)</p>
<p>Another thing; the internet has grown to the point where it kills all kinds of culture that previously had a uniqueness. Take for instance the geek culture, I used to be a geek but I revoked the title myself due to the fact that being a geek or nerd is nothing special ever since other people have flooded the internet with their &#8220;<em>prowess</em>&#8221; and &#8220;<em>geek wisdom</em>&#8220;. Please, any person can take a camera and take an image; any person can take a microphone and talk about technology; any person can even review technology gadgets; any person can create tweets that they think is clever but it takes a <em>master</em> to make a great photo or a great podcast; and the quote that I said doesn&#8217;t even matter now that everybody is dumbing themselves down for this audience of self-proclaimed geeks who talk in lowercase and seem to have come out of the wrong side of the womb in terms of intellectual conversation. (not to say that many geeks aren&#8217;t intelligent, most of the new ones aren&#8217;t though.) I swear everything has to rely so much on flashy graphics and imaging to lure the general public into listening to people who barely know anything about what they&#8217;re talking about and have a ridiculously huge ego (which ends up making them look like hacks.) and there are more of these people then there are actual geeks who know about this stuff; which there were many of a long time ago. Back then it used to be about technology now it&#8217;s mostly about the coverage of cellphones, gadgets, social media sites, web apps and the occasional big event to break up the monotony. You barely get to see actual technology anymore.</p>
<p>Point I&#8217;m making is that society as we know it has been dumbed down with all of this technology and shit is that it&#8217;s killing it; I blame it on the fault of these parents who don&#8217;t raise their kids right and teach them about how hard the real world can be, which is the downside to everything as they choose to ignore reality and focus on themselves rather then face reality. I swear the internet is bringing out the worst egos in people and I have trouble seeing past the egos, makes me respect the person even less; not that there are many people out there worth giving my respects to, the only people I&#8217;m going to respect are those who can produce top-quality shit and those who mean something in this world instead of just dodeling off trying to become an <em>&#8220;internet superstar&#8221;</em>, which is pointless in my opinion. What&#8217;s worse is that society is starting to rely more on this technology to the point where we can watch the newest movies at our own home for highly inflated prices, that all of our books will be uploaded to digital and the resulting pages will be burned away (if they were ever foolish enough to think that digital technology would be reliable; what happens when an EMP bomb drops all over the US, all of the data would be lost!), that all of the old ways are obsolete and we should the newer ways are better. (this is true for Hulu, Netflix, Gamefly, travel sites, not so much for the other stuff.) Hey, I&#8217;m a big user of technology as the other man but I fear that are usage will turn into our biggest flaw that will bring upon our downfall; and with the way society is killing itself, <em>I predict it&#8217;ll be very soon.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taylorkarras.com/2011/05/23/society-is-dying-we-cant-help-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why you Diggers overreacting on the DiggBar?</title>
		<link>http://www.taylorkarras.com/2009/04/08/why-you-diggers-overreacting-on-the-diggbar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.taylorkarras.com/2009/04/08/why-you-diggers-overreacting-on-the-diggbar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 02:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Karras</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diggbar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outrageous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylorkarras.com/index.php/2009/04/08/why-you-diggers-overreacting-on-the-diggbar/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a Digg user, I’m able to view the latest news from any subject, digg any stories that I find good, comment on them and submit any new stories or site from any source whatsoever. But lately I came across a piece of news about people hating the DiggBar simply because it uses “inline frames”, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Digg user, I’m able to view the latest news from any subject, digg any stories that I find good, comment on them and submit any new stories or site from any source whatsoever. But lately I came across a <a title="Wired: DiggBar Digs up Bitter Nostalgia Among Critics" href="http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/04/diggbar-digs-up.html" target="_blank">piece of news</a> about people hating the DiggBar simply because it uses “inline frames”, it’s “obtrusive”, it keeps people on the Digg domain and some other reasons which are entirely stupid. Now… I’ve been using Digg and I entirely like it because it allows me to Digg a page much more conviently after I’ve read it, allows me to share the news piece to other sites, basically allows me a lot of the functions on the Digg site (except the ability to submit stories) and I don’t see what the big fuss with the DiggBar and that’s just my opinion. But as usual Digg user’s are making an uproar because of the reasons stated above and it just seems entirely stupid because they’re making up any reason they can just to complain. Oh it isn’t right, oh this is different, oh Kevin Rose has betrayed us all.</p>
<p>First of all, people say it’s obtrusive, How is it obtrusive then any other toolbar out there today (web or not)? It’s not ginormous or anything or a size that’ll consume up most of the screen and it doesn’t even interfere with anything, I can read the article just fine without anything obstructing my view. And also, I don’t get the thing about it being in a separate inline frame being bad. First off, the DiggBar is resizable, I’ve tried this and the DiggBar just hides the text slightly and the inline frame resizes horizontally among the window meaning it works with almost every screen resolution imaginable. Secondly the web has changed since the age of flashy design elements and people are designing their websites with an mix of design and style, meaning that their designing sensibly rather then going out of control, just look at almost any site on the web today. Third, some sites still use inline frames and I don’t get the cross compatibility issues that you keep complaining about, rather they resize accordingly just like the DiggBar</p>
<p>Frankly, you guys that hate the DiggBar are just overreacting because frankly you can disable the bar if you don’t like it and if you don’t like Digg then you don’t have to use or join Digg if you don’t want to. While I do agree with some of your guys reasons, this is just completely insane. For people saying that they’re keeping you on Digg’s domain and not redirecting you to the source link, the source link is in an inline frame itself which means that the page gets loaded as normal and that page get’s a view count. Also I need to clear some things up about some of the absurd things that I’ve heard. DiggBar does not display it’s own advertisements per say, there are no Google Ads, no Banner Ads, nothing. If you’re thinking that it’s one big advertisement for Digg then you seriously need some help.</p>
<p>One thing that really bothers me is the fact that <a title="TechCrunch: Digg Is Working On a Toolbar To Go After StumbleUpon, TinyURL, and All The Rest" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/02/26/digg-is-working-on-a-toolbar-to-go-after-stumbleupon-tinyurl-and-all-the-rest/" target="_blank">people knew that the DiggBar was coming beforehand</a> and it had alot detailed information on how the DiggBar was going to work. It even described in full detail that it was going to be in an inline frame and Digg was going to have a shortened URL. There was even a small dicussion that was before the initial DiggBar release about some doubts that people have about the then unreleased DiggBar which was at the time being beta tested to make sure that Diggers’ would love it and not have a problem with it. You guys could of addressed these issues to Digg before they released the DiggBar and you guys complained about how sucky, that way you could of at least made a difference or at least made the DiggBar a little bit better. You guys could of said “Hey, I don’t like the upcoming DiggBar, there’s a specific thing that I don’t think is right”. Thankfully there’s a feedback button on the bar itself so you guys can help improve it but still, why didn’t some of you guys know about the upcoming DiggBar?</p>
<p>In closing, I have to say that all of you guys are simply overreacting to this, sure there might be people who like it and people who hate it but during the time I’ve used it, I have to say that it’s not obtrusive, that you guys are focusing too much on the inline frame as the source of criticism, that even though they’re keeping you in the Digg domain and not letting you leave Digg, you can just click the X on the top right of the toolbar or disable it entirety and most of the issues that you claim to be problems are exaggerated over the top. I admit that there are some problems such as logging in from the DiggBar is not as dynamic as I want it to be but overall people should just give the DiggBar a chance and not just complain about it because it uses obsolete technology or it radically changes Digg so much. I like Digg but I occasionally don’t like their users because of the childish way that they treat things (A.K.A. The Digg Ban Brigade), but overall the community is very mature, again, just give it a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taylorkarras.com/2009/04/08/why-you-diggers-overreacting-on-the-diggbar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Releasing Windows 7 now would be stupid</title>
		<link>http://www.taylorkarras.com/2009/02/21/releasing-windows-7-now-would-be-stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.taylorkarras.com/2009/02/21/releasing-windows-7-now-would-be-stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 02:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Karras</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[15 minutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylorkarras.com/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, so I hear Windows 7 is the toast of the town. It’s fast, better then Windows Vista and has very few issues except for some bugs that need to be fix. Unfortunately the quality of Windows 7 can lead one man named Kelly Poe to create a website called releasewindows7.com which aims to release [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so I hear Windows 7 is the toast of the town. It’s fast, better then Windows Vista and has very few issues except for some bugs that need to be fix. Unfortunately the quality of Windows 7 can lead one man named Kelly Poe to create a website called <a href="http://www.releasewindows7.com" target="_blank">releasewindows7.com</a> which aims to release Windows 7 on the market, as-it-is, in beta form, now. Now I don’t know the guy nor does anyone else, but he does say that he’s a major Windows fan and he loves a lot of things… I’m trying to wrap my head around why this is important. He say a lot that he’s really excited about the reviews of beta versions of Windows 7 (I don’t know if he uses Windows 7 himself) from only two sources, Leo Laporte and Paul Thurott (who ironically hosts a podcast with Leo on the same network, and <a href="http://community.winsupersite.com/blogs/paul/archive/2009/01/29/silly-release-windows-7-now-campaign.aspx" target="_blank">woefully rejects this stupid thing</a>) and according to those reviews that say that the Beta is surprisingly good, he decided to do this thing. This thing looks like something stupid that I would do surprisingly.</p>
<p>Okay, he says he understands that he understands bug fixes and taking the time to make sure it’s ready for mass consumption and the entire thing was created to show a community that they’re ready for Windows 7 and they’re apparently proud of it. Really, this doesn’t make any sense. If you wanted to create a group that shows people that are truly excited for Windows 7 then you’d probably create a Facebook group on it or join some Windows forum or create an IRC chatroom titled #windows7, that would of make tons more sense then this publicity grabbing site there is. Really, there should be some community to release Duke Nukem Forever, that’s being developed for a long time and should of flown a long time ago, that way the game would be released and Duke Nukem Forever would finally not be identified as vaporware. Seriously creating a community with the basis that you want to release Windows 7 now is stupid, instead you should of been entirely honest and just said that you were just excited for Windows 7.</p>
<p>Honestly, releasing a product now would be utter chaos, just look at the premature release of Windows ME, there were lots of flaws, bugs, and most importantly lots of crashes and BSoD’s which drove people to the near brink of insanity. Windows Vista was similar due to the fact that there were lots of incompatible hardware and software out there, people had to buy much more powerful hardware due to the higher system requirements and the 7 confusing editions. If Windows 7 were released now, then it’d be a nightmare for everyone to see that Windows 7 has disappointed everyone who believed in it. Software needs time to perfect (though I do say that they’re capable of making it to RC faster), to make a perfect experience for everybody, to make it sell and to make it exceed everyone’s expectations like every release of Mac OS X.</p>
<p>The site has even got some publicity due to the because of the avidness of the Windows fan and the impossibility of releasing Windows 7, and most of it seems to be making fun of it. Even though he does not get the idea, he still appreciates all of the publicity he’s getting and even posts it on his website. He’s even proud of a mention on MacBreak Weekly (if you’ve gotten a mention on a Mac specific podcast, that means they’re really taking you “seriously”) and “Microsoft” is reaching out to interview him… I’ll take this with a grain of salt because when Windows 7 is released which is to most people late 2009/early 2010 and after his 15 minutes of internet fame are up then Kelly Poe will go back to obscurity and this will be just another internet meme by 4chan but will instantly spread across the internet within a few weeks, which is what may happen due to the fact that releasing stuff now will likely be the new internet catchphrase mixed in with lots of products we wished got released.</p>
<p>So that’s it in a nutshell. I want to say a few words before I end this, why does he ™ everything. It’s not a big problem but it definitely isn’t required. I use a lot of words without trademarks at the end generally because it doesn’t matter whether it’s at the end, because nobody’s going to sue for a word that’s being used in a general context. They’ll only sue when it’s used in an inappropriate and infringing context. Also he’s trying to start a community about people excited about Windows 7. To me, a community is where people can hang out, make new friends, talk about anything, share stuff with them and have a good time while doing it. Mostly all I see is a petition for people who want Windows 7 released now and the only thing that resembles a community is that Facebook group page a fan created. If he’s serious about making a community then he’ll have to rethink everything and take down that stupid petition in the first place. I appreciate what he’s trying to do but I don’t think it’ll work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taylorkarras.com/2009/02/21/releasing-windows-7-now-would-be-stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 and Snow Leopard, what&#8217;s the difference?</title>
		<link>http://www.taylorkarras.com/2009/02/08/windows-7-and-snow-leopard-whats-the-difference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.taylorkarras.com/2009/02/08/windows-7-and-snow-leopard-whats-the-difference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 22:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Karras</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[difference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylorkarras.com/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2 years ago, Windows Vista and Mac OS X Leopard were released onto the world. Both of them contained new features, a completely redesigned but still familiar interface, fixes that were greatly appreciated and lots and lots of fixes, security enhancements and safety features. I’ve tried both of them and I’ve found them completely easy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 years ago, Windows Vista and Mac OS X Leopard were released onto the world. Both of them contained new features, a completely redesigned but still familiar interface, fixes that were greatly appreciated and lots and lots of fixes, security enhancements and safety features. I’ve tried both of them and I’ve found them completely easy to use, fast but not as fast as I expected and also mostly easy to set up. Unfortunately there were some problems such as higher system requirements (with both 800MHz Processor and 512MB RAM Minimum required for Leopard or Vista (the Home Basic edition)) to even install and run it and somewhat requiring having moderately powerful or a top-of-the-end system if they wanted to get the most out of either system. Mostly people were split between the newer OS (with people surprisingly recommending Leopard over Vista) and the older OS, mostly because Vista and Leopard initially broke some apps and some hardware wouldn’t run under both systems. Fast forward to the present, a lot of older applications now run on both Vista and Leopard with most features available, most of the hardware is now compatible with both systems and some specialty apps have been updated to work with the newer OS’.</p>
<p>Now we’re expecting the release of the latest OS’ from Microsoft and Apple, Windows 7 and Mac OS X Snow Leopard. Normally they’d include some new features and some major improvements into these releases (with the Mac OS X releases coming yearly as new versions but I don’t mind one bit). But these are positioned as incremental (a.k.a minor upgrades) which slightly lowers my expectations. This may be reasonable due to the fact that Vista and Leopard were slightly disappointing and didn’t feel exactly like they were getting what they thought they were getting, with some or lots of features being cut from Vista and Leopard (this may not be entirely true, if you think what I said is wrong, email me.), Specifically Vista’s 6 confusing and unnecessary editions being placed on the market and Vista, being marketed poorly and the Vista compatible lawsuit, might of hindered it’s impact and gave people a bad impression of Vista that continues even to this day.</p>
<p>So what’s new? Making everything run, boot and install faster, that is one of the main focuses of both Windows 7 and Snow Leopard, removing unnecessary services, reducing the initial space it takes up and also reducing how much memory it uses and introducing new boot technologies, including one in Windows 7 that allows it to boot up in 15 seconds (it’s not included in the current Windows 7 beta but I think it may be included in the upcoming release candidate version, again, I’m not sure). This has been what everyone has been clamoring up for the past year or so, an OS that doesn’t take up that much space and boots up in a short time. The space these OS’s take up currently is absurd. Both Windows Vista and Mac OS X takes up to around 7.00 GBs of space with everything included and people with small hard drive space have had trouble adopting them because it would be a hard drive space hog with all of the stuff included on it, now that problem may be history. Also the speed enhancements are nice because people with slower computer will be able to use the system like the developers indented. I predict that those with older Pentium 4 processers will be excited beyond belief.</p>
<p>Also new is the new multi-touch stuff that they’re adding, ever since the iPhone popularized multi-touch beyond belief, everyone’s been trying to create or hype their next touch-based product (I’m looking at you Microsoft Surface). But I’m surprised that their including multi-touch into both Windows 7 and Snow Leopard, really. This brings a lot of possible for both systems because you can resize and move windows, documents, slide between individual screens, move back and forward between pages, scroll through pages easier, highlight text, it’s even useful for a new generation of games (which you can already download and play on the iPhone but for Windows and Mac OS X, this is new). The upcoming multi-touch monitors that are being released and prepped for Windows 7 and Snow Leopard will bring multi-touch to the masses, expect them to cost a lot though and make sure that you really need one before buying one, the multi-touch looks cool but think about what you’ll use it for.</p>
<p>The most surprising thing I’ve seen is the new versions of QuickTime (X) and Windows Media Player (12) supporting a vast array of codecs beyond WMV (for Windows Media Player), MOV, MPG4 (for QuickTime) and raw AVI (for both players). From what I’ve used, they now support a vast array of modern codecs that you had to manually download and install before to get the Media Player to be compatible with most media files and play them out of the box. I truly appreciate them for including support for nearly every video codec and file there is, really saves me a lot of trouble whenever I reinstall my OS or one of my codecs mysteriously stop working. This has been long wished for but they were afraid that something was blocking them from including it, but they’ve been able to find a way to create their own way to play DiVx, MP4, WMV, AAC or whatever codecs these Media Players don’t currently support.</p>
<p>Still, even though their file managers are the same, their interfaces the same and also some things remain the same. These operating systems do have different features that separate them from being entirely similar. So these are not Service Packs or anything because these usually contain fixes to bugs already in the operating system as well as some new features specific to that operating system. These are bringing something to the table that we have mostly not seen before or we requested that it be put in there. It may be something new like native support for a file system or something entirely new altogether. It still shows that they’re interested in putting new stuff that’s revolutionary and cool and it also sorta increases the value of it, here’s what each OS will contain.</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="600" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="300">
<p align="center"><font size="4"><strong><u>Windows 7</u></strong></font></p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="300">
<p align="center"><font size="4"><strong><u>Mac OS X Snow Leopard</u></strong></font></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="300">
<ul>
<li><em>Reduced UAC Prompts</em> </li>
<li><em>Improved Windows Media Center</em> </li>
<li><em>Libraries</em> </li>
<li><em>Action Center</em> </li>
<li><em>New Dock-like Sidebar</em> </li>
<li><em>Hidable Taskbar Icons</em> </li>
<li><em>Gadgets on Desktops</em> </li>
</ul>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="300">
<ul>
<li><em>OpenCL</em> </li>
<li><em>Redesigned Finder</em> </li>
<li><em>Support for 16TBs RAM</em> </li>
<li><em>Grand Central</em> </li>
<li><em>Exchange 2007</em> </li>
<li><em>64-bit kernal </em>(Finally!) </li>
<li><em>A possibly new interface</em> </li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Still despite it mostly being speed enhancements and new behind-the-hood technologies, there is nothing mostly different between good releases. Still, based on what I’ve tried, they are better then their initial predecessors and it should be on every geek’s wish list. Basing from what I tried of Windows 7, it’s better then Windows Vista and I’m sure that Snow Leopard will blow away Leopard. Still, I think these companies may be saying that they’re sorry and that they want you to fall in love all over again (For Leopard users, they may be happier that the system will be faster then ever before) and from everyone elses experiences and some people demanding they release Windows 7 now. I feel that these will be more then succ<br />
essful and it might be enough to make people forget about the wobbly launches of Vista and the downsides of Leopard. Still, there’s nothing majorly different between them, but I feel like you should upgrade when they come out in 2009 or 2010, whether you’re on Mac or PC. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taylorkarras.com/2009/02/08/windows-7-and-snow-leopard-whats-the-difference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hello, Welcome and this is my website.</title>
		<link>http://www.taylorkarras.com/2009/01/24/hello-welcome-and-this-is-my-website/</link>
		<comments>http://www.taylorkarras.com/2009/01/24/hello-welcome-and-this-is-my-website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 11:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Karras</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[album]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taylorkarras.com/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, if you didn''t already know me. My name is Taylor Karras, rapper, geek, musician, and a lot of things that you might of made up in your head. Over the 4 years that I''ve seen, blogging has evolved from people hosting blogs independently, podcasting from people doing it uniquely, and one of a kind web services that only a genius could of thought of...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, if you didn&#8217;t already know me. My name is Taylor Karras, rapper, geek, musician, and a lot of things that you might of made up in your head. Over the 4 years that I&#8217;ve seen, blogging has evolved from people hosting blogs independently, podcasting from people doing it uniquely, and one of a kind web services that only a genius could of thought of, to people having blogs on WordPress.com and blogger without anything unique to say, podcasts being stale and derivative , and web services copying off the most popular site and adding a &quot;gimmick&quot; to it. I for one have missed out on those years mostly because I ignored them like it was nothing and I am tired of seeing a lot of this and also I want to promote my career, music, and have a page for my podcast. So I&#8217;ve decided to host my own blog/website without any gimmicks (I&#8217;m looking at you Widgets and &quot;2.0&quot;), any pre-defined themes, or any description/slogan. What you are reading is the first post of soon to be many posts and a soon-to-be-fully-filled website. What you are reading here is pure thought without any smiley faces, IM speak or idiocy.</p>
<p>Now you&#8217;re probably thinking hey, who created this theme, did you pay for it? To answer that question, I created it and I didn&#8217;t pay a penny to create it or get someone to create it. This theme took 4 or maybe 5 days to make, had to apply the code, fix positioning errors, make it cross compatible with other browsers you know, the usual. It&#8217;s dark, slick, techy, modern and it&#8217;s not even released for public download (when I do post the theme for public download, I&#8217;ll give it a proper name and download link.). I just feel with everyone using themes other people created or that are available at WordPress.com. Note that I do respect the people who create the themes and the people who modify it to suit their needs, but it&#8217;s just the fact that people can do everything with these themes without touching it. You&#8217;re also thinking why there is no sidebar on the right if you&#8217;re just looking at this post, well people might not know it yet but I don&#8217;t want my sidebar full of useless and unnecessary widgets or nothing leaving along noticeable trails of blank space which nothing will ever take up or use. There most of your questions answered.</p>
<p>Also note that due to the economy and various budget issues, I do not have enough money to buy anything geeks glamour over these days. So I cannot get that iPhone and start my photography career, I can&#8217;t get that iMac that I ever wanted and even so, me and my family are probably going to end up in the streets. I know I&#8217;m overreacting but I&#8217;m just here to ensure you that the following sections I depicted in my mockup will be available eventually. Also note that the Podcast is going along fine, I have a studio setup complete with a pop filter, microphone stand, USB studio microphone, though I do need to find a way for people to browse episodes. Also while I haven&#8217;t started work on my debut album &quot;Hello! My Name is Taylor Karras&quot; yet, I&#8217;ve been writing up some lyrics to replace some songs that I don&#8217;t think fit on the CD but it&#8217;ll probably be out by May of 2009, possibly later or earlier.</p>
<p>So, that&#8217;s it for me. Welcome my website, what appears to be a long winding road heading nowhere. So please, sit back and subscribe, also enjoy the ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taylorkarras.com/2009/01/24/hello-welcome-and-this-is-my-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

